<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Didj</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stephanieoppenheim.com/2008/09/didj/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stephanieoppenheim.com/2008/09/didj/</link>
	<description>Thoughts on Toys from the Co-Founder of the Oppenheim Toy Portfolio</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2013 15:58:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: toyportfolio</title>
		<link>http://stephanieoppenheim.com/2008/09/didj/comment-page-1/#comment-441</link>
		<dc:creator>toyportfolio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 17:52:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://toyportfolio.wordpress.com/?p=142#comment-441</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That&#039;s disappointing but good to know.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s disappointing but good to know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: susan schildhaus</title>
		<link>http://stephanieoppenheim.com/2008/09/didj/comment-page-1/#comment-442</link>
		<dc:creator>susan schildhaus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 01:22:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://toyportfolio.wordpress.com/?p=142#comment-442</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[unfortunately, there&#039;s still nothing good to report. our infatuation with the didj was short-lived. the online feature seemed really promising, but since our unit doesn&#039;t stay &quot;connected&quot;, it can&#039;t be updated, and that renders the didj a paperweight!
we cannot use the didj at all. thank goodness for our very old but very reliable leapster.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>unfortunately, there&#8217;s still nothing good to report. our infatuation with the didj was short-lived. the online feature seemed really promising, but since our unit doesn&#8217;t stay &#8220;connected&#8221;, it can&#8217;t be updated, and that renders the didj a paperweight!<br />
we cannot use the didj at all. thank goodness for our very old but very reliable leapster.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
